← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Price Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0553 0.0553 0.1545 0.1545
2020-21 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 11 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 53 13 31 44 0.830 0.2755 0.2880 0.7694 0.8042
2022-23 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 16 1 3 4 0.250 0.1537 0.1497 0.7366 0.7176
2023-24 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 45 22 26 48 1.067 0.3539 0.3357 0.9886 0.9378
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA 27 8 6 14 0.518
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA 16 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11058
Forward overall
#492
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.