IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Foo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-12 Country: Canada
2017 · Round 5, Pick #144  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Signed Professionally
Shanghai Dragons · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 — AJHL 49 8 20 28 0.571 0.1916 0.2086 0.5288 0.5758
2016-17 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 34 32 66 1.100 0.3689 0.3837 1.0179 1.0587
2020-21 Shanghai Dragons KHL 32 2 1 3 0.094 0.2345 0.2345 1.2924 1.2924
2021-22 Shanghai Dragons KHL 35 7 10 17 0.486 1.2143 1.4535 6.6923 8.0103
2022-23 Shanghai Dragons KHL 60 15 15 30 0.500 1.2500 1.3959 6.8894 7.6936
2023-24 Shanghai Dragons KHL 53 10 14 24 0.453 1.1320 1.2008 6.2390 6.6184
2024-25 Shanghai Dragons KHL 46 6 9 15 0.326 0.8153 0.8408 4.4932 4.6337
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Union D1 ECAC JR 20 3 4 7 0.350
2018-19 Union D1 ECAC SO 35 5 10 15 0.429
2017-18 Union D1 ECAC FR 33 1 5 6 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2017-18 · Union
-32.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1469
Forward overall
#80
Forward born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.