Greg Moro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-10-01 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2013-14	Humboldt Broncos	SJHL	47	0	5	5	0.106	0.0273	0.0288	0.0802	0.0847
2014-15	Humboldt Broncos	SJHL	53	5	22	27	0.509	0.1305	0.1311	0.3840	0.3856
2015-16	Humboldt Broncos	SJHL	28	6	10	16	0.571	0.1464	0.1398	0.4307	0.4113
2022-23	—	Liiga	39	2	6	8	0.205	0.5128	0.4820	1.7631	1.6572
2023-24	SaiPa	Liiga	39	1	4	5	0.128	0.3205	0.2911	1.1020	1.0009

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2019-20	Clarkson	D1	ECAC	SR	32	1	6	7	0.219
2018-19	Clarkson	D1	ECAC	JR	39	5	15	20	0.513
2017-18	Clarkson	D1	ECAC	SO	38	0	8	8	0.210
2016-17	Clarkson	D1	ECAC	FR	38	2	8	10	0.263

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.13

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.26

2016-17 · Clarkson

+104.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

92%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2572

Defenseman overall

#518

Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Rihards Marenis

Aurora · 2021-22

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Ben Blasko

Nazareth · 2016-17

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Shaquille Merasty

Adrian · 2016-17

1.357 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.