| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Whitecourt Wolverines | AJHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | — | AJHL | 53 | 3 | 25 | 28 | 0.528 | 0.1772 | 0.1804 | 0.4889 | 0.4976 |
| 2017-18 | Camrose Kodiaks | AJHL | 59 | 8 | 31 | 39 | 0.661 | 0.2217 | 0.2132 | 0.6117 | 0.5882 |
| 2018-19 | Camrose Kodiaks | AJHL | 51 | 14 | 38 | 52 | 1.020 | 0.3420 | 0.3123 | 0.9435 | 0.8615 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Bowling Green | D1 | CCHA | — | 36 | 1 | 19 | 20 | 0.556 |
| 2021-22 | Merrimack | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 35 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.457 |
| 2020-21 | Merrimack | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 16 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.562 |
| 2019-20 | Merrimack | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 33 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.242 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.