← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaleb Ergang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-12-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 58 11 15 26 0.448 0.1504 0.1653 0.4149 0.4559
2018-19 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 40 10 17 27 0.675 0.2264 0.2378 0.6246 0.6561
2019-20 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 51 17 38 55 1.078 0.3617 0.3617 0.9980 0.9980
2020-21 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 12 4 3 7 0.583 0.1956 0.1956 0.5398 0.5398
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA SR 35 6 15 21 0.600
2023-24 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 34 5 9 14 0.412
2022-23 Ferris State D1 CCHA SO 19 1 2 3 0.158
2021-22 Ferris State D1 CCHA FR 21 5 6 11 0.524
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2021-22 · Ferris State
+193.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21189
Forward overall
#970
Forward born in 2000
#506
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2017-18
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2016-17
1.276 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2016-17
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.