IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Bamber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-07-07 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Grant MacEwan Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 13 0 1 1 0.077 0.0258 0.0290 0.0712 0.0801
2018-19 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 37 1 11 12 0.324 0.1088 0.1171 0.3001 0.3229
2019-20 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 56 9 13 22 0.393 0.1318 0.1318 0.3636 0.3636
2020-21 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 16 4 5 9 0.562 0.1887 0.1887 0.5205 0.5205
2021-22 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 54 10 21 31 0.574 0.1926 0.1792 0.5313 0.4943
2025-26 Grant MacEwan Univ. USports-M 28 4 12 16 0.571 0.3015 0.2807 1.6748 1.5591
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 American International D1 AHA — 35 6 12 18 0.514
2023-24 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 34 4 9 13 0.382
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 27 4 6 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2022-23 · Alaska Anchorage
+154.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4749
Defenseman overall
#1081
Defenseman born in 2001

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.