← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Phillips Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 North Carolina Golden Bears EHL 43 27 44 71 1.651 0.3814 0.4229 0.8079 0.8959
2019-20 Brooks Bandits AJHL 52 11 23 34 0.654 0.2193 0.2193 0.6050 0.6050
2020-21 Brooks Bandits AJHL 19 8 12 20 1.053 0.3530 0.3530 0.9741 0.9741
2021-22 Brooks Bandits AJHL 45 23 68 91 2.022 0.6782 0.6314 1.8713 1.7421
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 23 6 13 19 0.826
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA 34 11 20 31 0.912
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 AHA 5 1 2 3 0.600
2022-23 Holy Cross D1 AHA 38 7 11 18 0.474
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2022-23 · Holy Cross
-7.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6789
Forward overall
#279
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.