← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Mahan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 48 9 6 15 0.312 0.1037 0.1037 0.2896 0.2896
2020-21 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 9 3 4 7 0.778 0.2581 0.2581 0.7209 0.7209
2021-22 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 60 29 42 71 1.183 0.3926 0.3738 1.0967 1.0443
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA SR 26 7 2 9 0.346
2024-25 RIT D1 AHA JR 35 3 2 5 0.143
2023-24 RIT D1 AHA SO 35 6 7 13 0.371
2022-23 RIT D1 AHA FR 39 11 9 20 0.513
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2022-23 · RIT
+60.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18373
Forward overall
#848
Forward born in 2001
#494
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia (WI) · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.