← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Barker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-07 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Guelph · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.0838 0.0838 0.2314 0.2314
2021-22 Calgary Canucks AJHL 60 20 31 51 0.850 0.2851 0.2843 0.7866 0.7843
2022-23 Calgary Canucks AJHL 60 29 35 64 1.067 0.3578 0.3390 0.9871 0.9353
2025-26 Univ. of Guelph USports-M 19 4 2 6 0.316 0.1666 0.1662 0.9256 0.9235
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Stonehill D1 AHA 24 4 3 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · Stonehill
+7.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20875
Forward overall
#1116
Forward born in 2002

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2010-11
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2015-16
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.