IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Klimpke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 29 11 6 17 0.586 0.1966 0.1970 0.5425 0.5436
2022-23 — AJHL 60 33 25 58 0.967 0.3242 0.3088 0.8946 0.8521
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 40 16 15 31 0.775
2024-25 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 26 10 13 23 0.885
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 37 15 11 26 0.703
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2023-24 · Robert Morris
+210.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23526
Forward overall
#1296
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Valeri Kneib
Beloit · 2022-23
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Warfield
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Fitzpatrick
Marian · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.