| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | — | MHL-RU | 36 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.167 | 0.0848 | 0.0848 | 0.4467 | 0.4467 |
| 2020-21 | — | MHL-RU | 36 | 3 | 16 | 19 | 0.528 | 0.2685 | 0.2685 | 1.4142 | 1.4142 |
| 2021-22 | — | MHL-RU | 26 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.192 | 0.0978 | 0.0981 | 0.5153 | 0.5169 |
| 2022-23 | — | MHL-RU | 45 | 2 | 16 | 18 | 0.400 | 0.2035 | 0.1939 | 1.0718 | 1.0214 |
| 2023-24 | Tri-City Storm | USHL | 54 | 11 | 32 | 43 | 0.796 | 0.4697 | 0.4243 | 2.3916 | 2.1605 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Miami | D1 | NCHC | SO | 33 | 2 | 19 | 21 | 0.636 |
| 2024-25 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | — | 29 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.241 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.