IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vladislav Lukashevich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-23 Country: Russia
2021 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #120  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — MHL-RU 36 2 4 6 0.167 0.1120 0.1120 0.3744 0.3744
2020-21 — MHL-RU 36 3 16 19 0.528 0.3547 0.3547 1.1855 1.1855
2021-22 — MHL-RU 26 0 5 5 0.192 0.1292 0.1296 0.4319 0.4333
2022-23 — MHL-RU 45 2 16 18 0.400 0.2688 0.2562 0.8985 0.8563
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 54 11 32 43 0.796 0.4895 0.4422 2.3461 2.1194
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC SO 33 2 19 21 0.636
2024-25 Michigan D1 BigTen — 29 1 6 7 0.241
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2024-25 · Michigan
-30.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2443
Defenseman overall
#588
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.