← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vladislav Lukashevich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-23 Country: Russia
2021 · Round 4, Pick #120  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — MHL-RU 36 2 4 6 0.167 0.0848 0.0848 0.4465 0.4465
2020-21 — MHL-RU 36 3 16 19 0.528 0.2685 0.2685 1.4138 1.4138
2021-22 — MHL-RU 26 0 5 5 0.192 0.0978 0.0981 0.5151 0.5167
2022-23 — MHL-RU 45 2 16 18 0.400 0.2035 0.1939 1.0715 1.0211
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 54 11 32 43 0.796 0.4697 0.4243 2.3895 2.1586
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Miami D1 NCHC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC SO 33 2 19 21 0.636
2024-25 Michigan D1 BigTen — 29 1 6 7 0.241
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2024-25 · Michigan
-23.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2622
Defenseman overall
#635
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.