IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Gordon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-12-13 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Linköping HC · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 58 20 27 47 0.810 0.2076 0.2310 0.6108 0.6797
2003-04 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 55 20 44 64 1.164 0.2981 0.3174 0.8771 0.9340
2015-16 Linköping HC SHL 52 18 26 44 0.846 2.1155 1.6870 11.0417 8.8052
2016-17 Linköping HC SHL 50 8 16 24 0.480 1.2000 0.8865 6.2633 4.6272
2017-18 Linköping HC SHL 47 16 10 26 0.553 1.3830 0.9775 7.2185 5.1020
2018-19 Linköping HC SHL 47 10 17 27 0.575 1.4363 0.9438 7.4964 4.9261
2019-20 Linköping HC SHL 28 8 11 19 0.679 1.6965 1.6965 8.8548 8.8548
2020-21 Linköping HC SHL 37 5 7 12 0.324 0.8107 0.8107 4.2317 4.2317
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 40 22 23 45 1.125
2005-06 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 42 20 20 40 0.952
2004-05 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC FR 38 9 8 17 0.447
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2004-05 · St. Cloud State
+84.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 33 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
6%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
94%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#895
Forward overall
#28
Forward born in 1985

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.