IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bear Trapp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-11-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Melville Millionaires SJHL 46 4 16 20 0.435 0.1324 0.1401 0.3222 0.3410
2003-04 Melville Millionaires SJHL 58 18 32 50 0.862 0.2626 0.2653 0.6389 0.6456
2004-05 Estevan Bruins SJHL 50 28 45 73 1.460 0.4447 0.4275 1.0820 1.0402
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 36 10 23 33 0.917
2007-08 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 34 13 27 40 1.177
2006-07 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 36 17 23 40 1.111
2005-06 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 34 16 27 43 1.265
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.26
2005-06 · Sacred Heart
+307.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14246
Forward overall
#421
Forward born in 1984
#129
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Klugerman
Concordia (WI) · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Acorn
Elmira · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.