IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Aucoin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-20 Country: USA
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 47 1 8 9 0.192 0.1130 0.1237 0.5746 0.6290
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 57 2 13 15 0.263 0.1553 0.1621 0.7898 0.8242
2025-26 Sarnia Sting OHL 67 7 20 27 0.403 0.2331 0.2313 1.0552 1.0471
2026-27 Sarnia Sting OHL 7 2 4 6 0.857 0.4958 0.4958 2.2442 2.2442
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7967
Defenseman overall
#1148
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matias Cleland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Bobby Nardella
USHL 2014-15
0.69
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Goudreau
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.