IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Aucoin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-20 Country: USA
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 47 1 8 9 0.192 0.1130 0.1237 0.5752 0.6296
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 57 2 13 15 0.263 0.1553 0.1621 0.7905 0.8249
2025-26 Sarnia Sting OHL 67 7 20 27 0.403 0.2331 0.2313 1.0355 1.0276
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7838
Defenseman overall
#1103
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Henry Nelson
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.03
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Matt Hellickson
USHL 2016-17
0.30
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Caeden Carlisle
OHL 2022-23
0.19
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Tory Dello
USHL 2015-16
0.31
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Doll
Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake McManus
Williams · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.