IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coleson Hanrahan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 25 2 5 7 0.280 0.0366 0.0413 0.0950 0.1073
2022-23 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 49 1 20 21 0.429 0.1747 0.1914 0.3445 0.3774
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 23 2 5 7 0.304 0.1795 0.1792 0.9139 0.9124
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 7 19 26 0.433 0.2556 0.2421 1.3014 1.2328
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass D1 HockeyEast FR 30 0 4 4 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2025-26 · UMass
-34.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2640
Defenseman overall
#657
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Eruzione
Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Unger
Keene State · 2023-24
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.