← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coleson Hanrahan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-16 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 25 2 5 7 0.280 0.0316 0.0357 0.0953 0.1077
2022-23 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 49 1 20 21 0.429 0.0990 0.1084 0.3466 0.3797
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 23 2 5 7 0.304 0.1795 0.1792 0.8965 0.8950
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 7 19 26 0.433 0.2556 0.2421 1.2766 1.2094
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass D1 HockeyEast FR 30 0 4 4 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2025-26 · UMass
-34.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2695
Defenseman overall
#691
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2006-07
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.