| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Yorkton Terriers | SJHL | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.833 | 0.2135 | 0.2383 | 0.6176 | 0.6894 |
| 2006-07 | Yorkton Terriers | SJHL | 55 | 22 | 25 | 47 | 0.855 | 0.2189 | 0.2328 | 0.6333 | 0.6735 |
| 2007-08 | Yorkton Terriers | SJHL | 47 | 13 | 20 | 33 | 0.702 | 0.1799 | 0.1820 | 0.5203 | 0.5263 |
| 2008-09 | Yorkton Terriers | SJHL | 56 | 17 | 28 | 45 | 0.804 | 0.2059 | 0.1980 | 0.5955 | 0.5726 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Manhattanville | D3 | — | JR | 25 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.280 |
| 2010-11 | Manhattanville | D3 | — | SO | 18 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.111 |
| 2009-10 | Manhattanville | D3 | — | FR | 23 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.348 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.