← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Terreri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 South Shore Kings EJHL 51 4 9 13 0.255 0.0755 0.0834
2005-06 South Shore Kings EJHL 44 8 10 18 0.409 0.1212 0.1280
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Salem State D3 MASCAC GR 12 0 7 7 0.583
2010-11 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 23 8 21 29 1.261
2009-10 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 27 10 21 31 1.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.15
2009-10 · Salem State
+1117.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46326
Forward overall
#1533
Forward born in 1988
#292
in EJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.