IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Cotton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-07 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 45 1 5 6 0.133 0.0819 0.0848 0.3927 0.4068
2013-14 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 50 23 36 59 1.180 0.4395 0.4456 1.7194 1.7431
2014-15 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 58 27 31 58 1.000 0.3725 0.3603 1.4571 1.4093
2015-16 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 28 6 5 11 0.393 0.2415 0.2158 1.1576 1.0343
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 34 20 17 37 1.088
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 37 9 14 23 0.622
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 39 12 9 21 0.538
2015-16 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.