IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Rubino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-02-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 4 2 1 3 0.750 0.2253 0.2346 0.5134 0.5347
2007-08 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 48 41 33 74 1.542 0.4631 0.4614 1.0553 1.0514
2008-09 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 38 18 27 45 1.184 0.3557 0.3361 0.8106 0.7660
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 27 7 9 16 0.593
2011-12 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 15 6 4 10 0.667
2010-11 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 27 13 14 27 1.000
2009-10 Williams D3 — FR 22 6 2 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2009-10 · Williams
+10.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8811
Forward overall
#324
Forward born in 1989
#159
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Spencer MacLean
Elmira · 2015-16
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Stachowiak
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Davis
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.