IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Rubino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-02-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 4 2 1 3 0.750 0.1838 0.1914 0.5164 0.5378
2007-08 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 48 41 33 74 1.542 0.3779 0.3765 1.0615 1.0575
2008-09 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 38 18 27 45 1.184 0.2902 0.2742 0.8153 0.7704
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 27 7 9 16 0.593
2011-12 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 15 6 4 10 0.667
2010-11 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 27 13 14 27 1.000
2009-10 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 22 6 2 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2009-10 · Williams
+34.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9291
Forward overall
#349
Forward born in 1989
#139
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Rudek
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Stachowiak
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Berglund
Manhattanville · 2013-14
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.