← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rylan Schwartz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-01-08 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
EC Kassel Huskies · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 9 6 4 10 1.111 0.2847 0.3188 0.8375 0.9377
2007-08 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 55 29 34 63 1.145 0.2935 0.3133 0.8635 0.9219
2008-09 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 48 39 49 88 1.833 0.4697 0.4780 1.3819 1.4063
2016-17 Heilbronner Falken DEL2 50 17 32 49 0.980 1.3128 1.4182 1.7585 1.8997
2018-19 Fischtown Pinguins DEL 52 10 13 23 0.442 1.1058 1.1018 3.7499 3.7365
2019-20 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 31 5 5 10 0.323 0.8065 0.8065 2.7351 2.7351
2020-21 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 42 17 29 46 1.095 1.4671 1.4671 1.9652 1.9652
2021-22 Löwen Frankfurt DEL2 52 26 33 59 1.135 1.5199 1.2553 2.0359 1.6815
2022-23 Löwen Frankfurt DEL 46 8 14 22 0.478 1.1958 0.9417 4.0551 3.1935
2023-24 Löwen Frankfurt DEL 29 0 8 8 0.276 0.6897 0.5078 2.3391 1.7220
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig 41 20 33 53 1.293
2011-12 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig 35 23 17 40 1.143
2010-11 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig 41 10 28 38 0.927
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2010-11 · Colorado College
+162.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14587
Forward overall
#588
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2023-24
1.480 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.