← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rylan Schwartz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-01-08 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
EC Kassel Huskies · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 9 6 4 10 1.111 0.3384 0.3789 0.8234 0.9219
2007-08 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 55 29 34 63 1.145 0.3489 0.3725 0.8489 0.9063
2008-09 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 48 39 49 88 1.833 0.5584 0.5683 1.3587 1.3827
2016-17 Heilbronner Falken DEL2 50 17 32 49 0.980 0.4228 0.4567
2018-19 Fischtown Pinguins DEL 52 10 13 23 0.442 0.4837 0.4820
2019-20 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 31 5 5 10 0.323 0.3528 0.3528
2020-21 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 42 17 29 46 1.095 0.4725 0.4725
2021-22 Löwen Frankfurt DEL2 52 26 33 59 1.135 0.4895 0.4043
2022-23 Löwen Frankfurt DEL 46 8 14 22 0.478 0.5231 0.4120
2023-24 Löwen Frankfurt DEL 29 0 8 8 0.276 0.3017 0.2221
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig 41 20 33 53 1.293
2011-12 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig 35 23 17 40 1.143
2010-11 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig 41 10 28 38 0.927
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2010-11 · Colorado College
+121.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14141
Forward overall
#574
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2010-11
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.