IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Watts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-05-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Aurora Tigers OJHL 38 11 9 20 0.526 0.1290 0.1361 0.3624 0.3823
2007-08 Aurora Tigers OJHL 35 15 27 42 1.200 0.2941 0.2969 0.8262 0.8342
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA — 25 13 12 25 1.000
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA — 27 12 11 23 0.852
2009-10 RPI D1 ECAC SO 18 1 0 1 0.056
2008-09 RPI D1 ECAC FR 28 1 3 4 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2008-09 · RPI
-28.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18391
Forward overall
#622
Forward born in 1989
#661
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Coatta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Barkley
Neumann · 2021-22
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Lafleur
Johnson & Wales · 2019-20
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.