IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Mackey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-10-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 20 0 3 3 0.150 0.0288 0.0288 0.0683 0.0683
2022-23 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 21 5 7 12 0.571 0.1097 0.1097 0.2603 0.2603
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 45 1 1 2 0.044 0.0262 0.0268 0.1329 0.1360
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 53 1 11 12 0.226 0.1336 0.1299 0.6778 0.6590
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15739
Defenseman overall
#2963
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Walinski
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Orem
Johnson & Wales · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Cecka
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.