IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Pace Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-12 Country: USA
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 USNTDP Juniors USHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1966 0.2134 1.0010 1.0865
2024-25 Tri-City Storm USHL 29 5 3 8 0.276 0.1628 0.1684 0.8286 0.8571
2025-26 Chicago Steel USHL 11 2 4 6 0.545 0.3218 0.3173 1.6384 1.6156
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19511
Forward overall
#583
Forward born in 2007
#1893
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Duane
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Christiano Versich
USHL 2015-16
0.57
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
Gavin Lindberg
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.27
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
Matthew Gleason
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
Evan Werner
USHL 2021-22
0.51
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Cannon Bonifay
Westfield State · 2023-24
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Moncovich
Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Smith
Chatham · 2019-20
1.292 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.