IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tom Molson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 24 2 7 9 0.375 0.1058 0.1058 0.1716 0.1716
2022-23 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 26 15 24 39 1.500 0.4232 0.4232 0.6864 0.6864
2023-24 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 26 15 28 43 1.654 0.4665 0.4665 — —
2024-25 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 18 31 49 0.907 0.3380 0.3246 1.3222 1.2697
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC FR 21 3 5 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2025-26 · Yale
+16.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8882
Forward overall
#372
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Inger
New England College · 2016-17
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Redick
Plymouth State · 2021-22
1.476 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Resch
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.