IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Aaronson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-15 Country: USA
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 16 1 2 3 0.188 0.1106 0.1145 0.5631 0.5827
2025-26 Omaha Lancers USHL 58 16 8 24 0.414 0.2441 0.2408 1.2428 1.2261
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28845
Forward overall
#989
Forward born in 2007
#2728
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Matt Coronato
NE-Prep 2018-19
1.06
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Casey Severo
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.30
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Ben MacDonald
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.47
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Nathan Krusko
NAHL 2014-15
0.49
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Janke
Norwich · 2008-09
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bayley Marshall
Aurora · 2015-16
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rusty Masters
Elmira · 2004-05
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.