IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Aaronson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-15 Country: USA
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 16 1 2 3 0.188 0.1106 0.1145 0.5626 0.5822
2025-26 Omaha Lancers USHL 58 16 8 24 0.414 0.2441 0.2408 1.2417 1.2250
2026-27 Omaha Lancers USHL 5 3 0 3 0.600 0.3539 0.3539 1.8004 1.8004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29245
Forward overall
#1033
Forward born in 2007
#2961
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Richard Gallant
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.53
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Alex Laferriere
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.89
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Justin Graf
NE-Prep 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Michael Callow
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.47
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

T.J. Sneath
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conger
UMass Boston · 2016-17
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.