← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Callow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-15 Country: USA
2022 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #154  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 28 5 6 11 0.393 0.1108 0.1108 0.1798 0.1798
2020-21 NTDP-U18 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 24 22 14 36 1.500 0.4232 0.4232
2022-23 USHL 61 21 19 40 0.656 0.4031 0.3973 1.9318 1.9038
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Harvard D1 ECAC JR 16 3 4 7 0.438
2024-25 Harvard D1 ECAC SO 30 3 5 8 0.267
2023-24 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 32 3 12 15 0.469
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2023-24 · Harvard
+34.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12152
Forward overall
#536
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.