IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Totten Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-12-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Flint Jr. Generals NA3HL 16 12 13 25 1.562 0.1883 0.1875 0.4936 0.4915
2011-12 Soo Eagles NOJHL 50 27 40 67 1.340 0.2259 0.2159 0.5568 0.5321
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Nichols D3 CNE SR 20 5 7 12 0.600
2014-15 Nichols D3 CNE JR 3 1 0 1 0.333
2013-14 Nichols D3 CNE SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Nichols D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Finlandia D3 — — 10 0 2 2 0.200

NCAAe Rankings

#18898
Forward overall
#753
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ricky Kramer
Fitchburg State · 2014-15
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jim Pearson
Concordia Wisconsin · 2015-16
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Pearson
Gustavus Adolphus · 2010-11
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.