IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon O'Quinn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-11 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Brock Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 47 8 6 14 0.298 0.0730 0.0791 0.2051 0.2223
2011-12 — OJHL 40 4 9 13 0.325 0.0797 0.0829 0.2238 0.2327
2012-13 Collingwood Blues OJHL 46 6 18 24 0.522 0.1279 0.1266 0.3592 0.3555
2013-14 Collingwood Blues OJHL 42 24 21 45 1.071 0.2626 0.2465 0.7377 0.6924
2017-18 Brock Univ. USports-M 28 8 9 17 0.607 0.3203 0.3040 1.7794 1.6889
2018-19 Brock Univ. USports-M 27 4 8 12 0.444 0.2345 0.2103 1.3025 1.1683
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 5 2 1 3 0.600
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 22 6 9 15 0.682
2014-15 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 26 7 6 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2014-15 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+194.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17098
Forward overall
#592
Forward born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2016-17
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Docking
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.