IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Docking Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-02-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 47 17 19 36 0.766 0.2140 0.2122 0.5286 0.5240
2007-08 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 40 9 45 54 1.350 0.3772 0.3569 0.9316 0.8814
2008-09 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 50 28 52 80 1.600 0.4470 0.4000 1.1042 0.9881
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 27 11 19 30 1.111
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 20 6 14 20 1.000
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 23 3 14 17 0.739
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2009-10 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+125.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6495
Forward overall
#308
Forward born in 1988
#159
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rick Varone
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.