← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jet Kwajah Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-13 Country: Canada
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Toronto Patriots OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Madison Capitols USHL 41 6 10 16 0.390 0.2302 0.2515 1.1719 1.2806
2025-26 Madison Capitols USHL 55 7 20 27 0.491 0.2896 0.3025 1.4744 1.5399
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3783
Defenseman overall
#260
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.29 No data
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NCDC 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2020-21
0.33
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2020-21
0.25
actual FR PPG at Penn State
CCHL 2018-19
0.19
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.