IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Nuttle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.4246 0.4449 1.9979 2.0934
2013-14 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 60 4 27 31 0.517 0.1919 0.1989 0.5471 0.5670
2014-15 — USHL 54 5 10 15 0.278 0.1769 0.1684 0.8325 0.7924
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 36 4 15 19 0.528
2017-18 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 33 2 10 12 0.364
2016-17 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 34 2 5 7 0.206
2015-16 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4948
Defenseman overall
#889
Defenseman born in 1995
#3014
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Nick
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nick Neville
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Sternbach
Hobart · 2015-16
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Ouellette
Southern Maine · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Alexander
Canton · 2023-24
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.