IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Roubos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Oakville Blades OJHL 19 3 2 5 0.263 0.0735 0.0776 0.1816 0.1916
2011-12 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.1274 0.1272 0.5993 0.5985
2012-13 — NAHL 55 19 25 44 0.800 0.2970 0.2923 0.8470 0.8335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 25 9 9 18 0.720
2015-16 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 27 6 8 14 0.518
2013-14 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 26 10 16 26 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2013-14 · Lawrence
+416.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16297
Forward overall
#615
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Bauman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2016-17
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Doull
Lake Forest · 2001-02
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2016-17
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.