IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Doull Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-04-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 58 15 21 36 0.621 0.2073 0.2106 0.5762 0.5853
2001-02 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 55 19 32 51 0.927 0.3097 0.2995 0.8608 0.8326
2002-03 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 63 29 38 67 1.063 0.3552 0.3269 0.9872 0.9086
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2003-04 Lake Forest D3 — FR 28 11 14 25 0.893
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2003-04 · Lake Forest
+230.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9959
Forward overall
#377
Forward born in 1982
#321
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Kenyon
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Paul
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Paquette
Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.