IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Hewson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Calgary Canucks AJHL 41 0 5 5 0.122 0.0409 0.0442 0.1129 0.1220
2023-24 Calgary Canucks AJHL 54 6 23 29 0.537 0.1801 0.1862 0.4969 0.5137
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 48 4 6 10 0.208 0.1229 0.1178 0.6256 0.5998
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13704
Defenseman overall
#2699
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Gibson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2009-10
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Bottem
Marian · 2022-23
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Gough
Adrian · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.