IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Hewson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-08 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Calgary Canucks AJHL 41 0 5 5 0.122 0.0405 0.0438 0.1131 0.1222
2023-24 Calgary Canucks AJHL 54 6 23 29 0.537 0.1782 0.1842 0.4977 0.5145
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 48 4 6 10 0.208 0.1280 0.1227 0.6137 0.5884
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13572
Defenseman overall
#2682
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Morgan
New England · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Nelson
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Conter
Southern Maine · 2005-06
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.