IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Trottier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-13 Country: USA
2026 · Round 6, Pick #189  ·  Montréal Canadiens
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 39 4 1 5 0.128 0.0953 0.0968 0.4784 0.4862
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 62 11 16 27 0.435 0.3237 0.3112 1.6250 1.5624
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17374
Forward overall
#237
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Drew Melanson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Gamez
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jayden Davis
AJHL 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Brennan Ali
NTDP-U18 2021-22
0.36
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Jacob Pivonka
NTDP-U18 2017-18
0.25
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Mike O'Leary
USHL 2015-16
0.11
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

James Tatro
Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxwell Donohoe
Neumann · 2021-22
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.