← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Trottier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-13 Country: USA
2026 · Round 6, Pick #189  ·  Montréal Canadiens
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 39 4 1 5 0.128 0.0953 0.0968 0.4807 0.4885
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 62 11 16 27 0.435 0.3237 0.3112 1.6330 1.5701
2026-27 Regina Pats WHL 4 2 1 3 0.750 0.3649 0.3649 1.8320 1.8320
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17647
Forward overall
#282
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2013-14
0.29
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
AJHL 2021-22
0.14
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
USHL 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
USHL 2022-23
0.36
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2023-24
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.