IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Collier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-08-09 Country: Netherlands
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Brockville Braves CCHL 53 4 19 23 0.434 0.0941 0.0916 0.3360 0.3271
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 23 3 7 10 0.435
2013-14 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 26 0 9 9 0.346
2012-13 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 24 2 10 12 0.500
2011-12 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 25 2 12 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2011-12 · Bowdoin
+547.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11863
Defenseman overall
#1347
Defenseman born in 1991
#1017
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christopher Mammas
Canton · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Saurbaugh
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Pfaff
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.