IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Mammas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Brockville Braves CCHL 47 2 3 5 0.106 0.0304 0.0315 0.0824 0.0853
2016-17 Cornwall Colts CCHL 46 11 9 20 0.435 0.1241 0.1219 0.3366 0.3306
2017-18 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 30 3 2 5 0.167 0.0619 0.0588 0.1765 0.1677
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Canton D3 — FR 12 4 5 9 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2018-19 · Canton
+943.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37718
Forward overall
#1756
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emerson Mish
SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Williams
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Evans
Northland · 2017-18
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.