IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Declan Gunovski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 48 6 7 13 0.271 0.0757 0.0808 0.1869 0.1995
2008-09 — OJHL 51 13 23 36 0.706 0.1972 0.2004 0.4871 0.4949
2009-10 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 46 11 18 29 0.630 0.1761 0.1697 0.4350 0.4191
2010-11 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 49 28 26 54 1.102 0.3079 0.2823 0.7605 0.6973
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Fredonia D3 — SO 14 1 3 4 0.286
2011-12 Fredonia D3 — FR 16 1 5 6 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2011-12 · Fredonia
+84.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15557
Forward overall
#658
Forward born in 1990
#972
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Radetic
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Alexander
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Schaly
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.