← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham Yeo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-11-12 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Laurentian Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Huntsville Otters OJHL 46 5 10 15 0.326 0.0799 0.0863 0.2245 0.2426
2010-11 Huntsville Otters OJHL 50 14 25 39 0.780 0.1912 0.1977 0.5370 0.5552
2011-12 Collingwood Blues OJHL 46 16 21 37 0.804 0.1971 0.1951 0.5538 0.5481
2012-13 Collingwood Blues OJHL 55 17 31 48 0.873 0.2139 0.2010 0.6009 0.5648
2014-15 Laurentian Univ. USports-M 18 3 3 6 0.333 0.1758 0.1834 0.9769 1.0190
2015-16 Laurentian Univ. USports-M 25 2 4 6 0.240 0.1266 0.1258 0.7034 0.6991
2016-17 Laurentian Univ. USports-M 25 2 10 12 0.480 0.2532 0.2392 1.4069 1.3291
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 7 1 1 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2013-14 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+68.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27982
Forward overall
#1046
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.