IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabe Shipper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Oklahoma City Ice Hawks NA3HL 20 8 8 16 0.800 0.1840 0.1840 0.2534 0.2534
2021-22 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 53 10 17 27 0.509 0.1552 0.1504 0.3775 0.3658
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 18 4 9 13 0.722
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 18 8 7 15 0.833
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 18 5 4 9 0.500
2022-23 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 25 11 6 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2022-23 · Bowdoin
+428.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33680
Forward overall
#1813
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Wetmore
Utica · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Berenguer
Hamline · 2005-06
0.944 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
George Curry
Canton · 2011-12
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.