← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Trompeter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-27 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 49 17 20 37 0.755 0.2774 0.3057
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15732
Forward overall
#207
Forward born in 2008
#1520
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.95
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2022-23
0.32
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
WHL 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2012-13
0.66
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.