IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Trompeter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-27 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 49 17 20 37 0.755 0.2774 0.3057 — —
2026-27 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 7 3 6 9 1.286 0.4724 0.5052 1.3589 1.4532
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16066
Forward overall
#252
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Sheldon Dries
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Kile
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.07 PPG
→ Michigan (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Greenberg
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Ortega
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Bobby Cowan
USHL 2024-25
0.62
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Aidan Muir
USHL 2013-14
0.42
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Sheldon Dries
USHL 2012-13
0.18
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Frederik Tiffels
USHL 2013-14
0.66
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Myles Abbate
Plymouth State · 2018-19
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.