IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Sumi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 38 14 11 25 0.658 0.1838 0.2033 0.4540 0.5021
2009-10 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 45 8 16 24 0.533 0.1490 0.1570 0.3680 0.3877
2010-11 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 43 14 20 34 0.791 0.2209 0.2224 0.5457 0.5495
2011-12 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 49 26 35 61 1.245 0.3478 0.3348 0.8591 0.8271
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 26 9 13 22 0.846
2014-15 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 27 9 17 26 0.963
2013-14 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 22 2 14 16 0.727
2012-13 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 24 5 6 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2012-13 · Elmira
+84.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13439
Forward overall
#586
Forward born in 1992
#765
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Doull
Lake Forest · 2001-02
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2016-17
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Orrin Hergott
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.