IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Orrin Hergott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-06-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 59 23 22 45 0.763 0.1954 0.2033 0.5749 0.5980
2001-02 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 57 34 22 56 0.983 0.2517 0.2496 0.7406 0.7345
2002-03 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 46 26 24 50 1.087 0.2785 0.2612 0.8194 0.7685
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2003-04 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 10 16 26 0.839
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2003-04 · St. Norbert
+281.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16230
Forward overall
#510
Forward born in 1982
#138
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Davis Kinne
Salem State · 2023-24
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Hamel
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Rudy
Hobart · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.