IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Meltzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Cornwall Colts CCHL 57 11 13 24 0.421 0.0913 0.0943 0.3260 0.3366
2010-11 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 60 14 22 36 0.600 0.1301 0.1279 0.4645 0.4566
2011-12 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 59 19 27 46 0.780 0.1691 0.1576 0.6036 0.5624
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 22 3 3 6 0.273
2014-15 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 20 3 1 4 0.200
2013-14 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 20 0 5 5 0.250
2012-13 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2012-13 · Connecticut College
+118.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27378
Forward overall
#968
Forward born in 1991
#581
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payton Kender
Rivier · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Dillon
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Costello
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.