| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Winkler Flyers | MJHL | 64 | 43 | 43 | 86 | 1.344 | 0.3654 | 0.3889 | 0.8469 | 0.9014 |
| 2013-14 | Fischtown Pinguins | DEL2 | 51 | 28 | 21 | 49 | 0.961 | 0.4145 | 0.3399 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Fischtown Pinguins | DEL2 | 51 | 28 | 19 | 47 | 0.922 | 0.3976 | 0.3204 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Dresdner Eislöwen | DEL2 | 52 | 29 | 18 | 47 | 0.904 | 0.3899 | 0.2881 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Bemidji State | D1 | — | SR | 36 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 1.111 |
| 2003-04 | Bemidji State | D1 | — | JR | 35 | 23 | 16 | 39 | 1.114 |
| 2002-03 | Bemidji State | D1 | — | SO | 36 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 0.444 |
| 2001-02 | Bemidji State | D1 | — | FR | 29 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.241 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.