← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kristopher Richards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-07-20 Country: USA
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 1 8 9 0.281 0.0557 0.0557 0.1281 0.1281
2025-26 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 56 9 13 22 0.393 0.2318 0.2346 1.1800 1.1941
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8539
Defenseman overall
#1188
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2023-24
0.24
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
AJHL 2017-18
0.59
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
NAHL 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2011-12
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2021-22
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.