← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lincoln Krizizke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-04-08 Country: USA
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Janesville Jets NAHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0919 0.1048 0.2639 0.3009
2025-26 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 51 6 12 18 0.353 0.2082 0.2182 1.0599 1.1108
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5952
Defenseman overall
#389
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
NTDP-U18 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
BCHL 2018-19
0.08
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stonehill · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.