← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lincoln Krizizke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-04-08 Country: USA
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Janesville Jets NAHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0919 0.1048 0.2642 0.3013
2025-26 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 51 6 12 18 0.353 0.2082 0.2182 1.0589 1.1097
2026-27 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.2360 0.2360 1.2003 1.2003
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6049
Defenseman overall
#457
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
BCHL 2017-18
0.06
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2021-22
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2014-15
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.