IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Forslund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-25 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Laurentian Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Collingwood Blues OJHL 52 4 12 16 0.308 0.0754 0.0788 0.2119 0.2214
2010-11 Collingwood Blues OJHL 16 9 4 13 0.812 0.1991 0.1987 0.5594 0.5584
2011-12 Caledon Admirals OJHL 48 22 25 47 0.979 0.2400 0.2289 0.6742 0.6432
2012-13 — OJHL 51 21 26 47 0.922 0.2259 0.2042 0.6345 0.5737
2015-16 Laurentian Univ. USports-M 19 1 4 5 0.263 0.1389 0.1331 0.7714 0.7391
2016-17 Laurentian Univ. USports-M 27 0 1 1 0.037 0.0195 0.0177 0.1084 0.0985
2017-18 Laurentian Univ. USports-M 28 7 8 15 0.536 0.2826 0.2440 1.5701 1.3559
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 22 2 1 3 0.136
2013-14 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 22 5 3 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2013-14 · Fredonia
+98.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32850
Forward overall
#1237
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.