IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Apreda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-10-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 55 4 9 13 0.236 0.0755 0.0817 0.1830 0.1981
2011-12 — OJHL 42 1 7 8 0.191 0.0572 0.0592 0.1304 0.1350
2012-13 Toronto Patriots OJHL 53 5 23 28 0.528 0.1587 0.1564 0.3616 0.3564
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Curry D3 CNE SR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2015-16 Curry D3 CNE JR 25 1 7 8 0.320
2014-15 Curry D3 CNE SO 13 0 4 4 0.308
2013-14 Curry D3 CNE FR 21 1 3 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2013-14 · Curry
+71.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15878
Defenseman overall
#1657
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cade Hanley
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Howie
Marian · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Girduckis
Chatham · 2017-18
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.