← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cade Hanley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-10-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 22 0 2 2 0.091 0.0110 0.0126 0.0287 0.0330
2016-17 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 47 1 26 27 0.575 0.0692 0.0760 0.1815 0.1993
2017-18 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 39 2 35 37 0.949 0.1143 0.1197 0.2997 0.3139
2018-19 Seahawks Hockey EHL 43 3 20 23 0.535 0.1148 0.1172 0.2619 0.2673
2019-20 Seahawks Hockey EHL 46 9 24 33 0.717 0.1540 0.1540 0.3513 0.3513
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 GR 18 0 4 4 0.222
2023-24 UMass Dartmouth D3 SR 16 1 1 2 0.125
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 JR 26 1 7 8 0.308
2021-22 UMass Dartmouth D3 SO 25 2 5 7 0.280
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 3 1 1 2 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2020-21 · UMass Dartmouth
+497.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8584
Defenseman overall
#1369
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2007-08
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2007-08
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.